Table B-4. Environmental Levels of Dibenzofurans in Water (ppq)
Chemical |
Number samples |
Number positive samples |
Concentration range |
Conc. mean |
Location |
Location description |
Samp. year |
Ref. no. |
Comments |
Tetrachlorodibenzofurans (MW=305.98) |
|||||||||
2,3,7,8-TCDF |
2 |
2 |
.022-.026 |
.024 |
Eman River, Sweden |
PCB contaminated |
NR |
3 |
raw surface drinking water |
1 |
0 |
ND(0.7) |
NA |
Lockport, New York |
NR |
88 |
2 |
raw surface drinking water |
|
TCDFs |
22 |
1 |
ND-2.6 |
0.12 |
New York State |
NR |
86-88 |
2 |
treated surface drinking water |
1 |
1 |
18 |
18 |
Lockport, New York |
NR |
88 |
2 |
raw surface drinking water |
|
2 |
2 |
.21-.23 |
0.22 |
Eman River, Sweden |
PCB contaminated |
NR |
3 |
raw surface drinking water |
|
Pentachlorodibenzofurans (MW=340.42) |
|||||||||
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF |
1 |
1 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
Lockport, New York |
NR |
88 |
2 |
raw surface drinking water |
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF |
2 |
2 |
.014-.019 |
.016 |
Eman River, Sweden |
PCB contaminated |
NR |
3 |
raw surface drinking water |
1 |
0 |
ND(1.0) |
NA |
Lockport, New York |
NR |
88 |
2 |
raw surface drinking water |
|
1,2,3,4,8/1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF |
2 |
2 |
.013-.025 |
.019 |
Eman River, Sweden |
PCB contaminated |
NR |
3 |
raw surface drinking water |
PeCDFs |
1 |
1 |
27 |
27 |
Lockport, New York |
NR |
88 |
2 |
raw surface drinking water |
22 |
0 |
ND(0.3-4.0) |
NA |
New York State |
NR |
86-88 |
2 |
treated surface drinking water |
|
2 |
2 |
.13-.21 |
.17 |
Eman River, Sweden |
PCB contaminated |
NR |
3 |
raw surface drinking water |
|
Hexachlorodibenzofurans (MW=374.87) |
|||||||||
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF |
1 |
1 |
39 |
39 |
Lockport, New York |
NR |
88 |
2 |
raw surface drinking water |
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF |
1 |
1 |
9.2 |
9.2 |
Lockport, New York |
NR |
88 |
2 |
raw surface drinking water |
2 |
2 |
.019-.025 |
.022 |
Eman River, Sweden |
PCB contaminated |
NR |
3 |
raw surface drinking water |
|
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF |
1 |
0 |
ND(1.3) |
NA |
Lockport, New York |
NR |
88 |
2 |
raw surface drinking water |
2 |
1 |
ND-.027 |
.014 |
Eman River, Sweden |
PCB contaminated |
NR |
3 |
raw surface drinking water |
|
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF |
1 |
0 |
ND(1.2) |
NA |
Lockport, New York |
NR |
88 |
2 |
raw surface drinking water |
2 |
1 |
ND-.022 |
.011 |
Eman River, Sweden |
PCB contaminated |
NR |
3 |
raw surface drinking water |
|
1,2,3,4,7,9/1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF |
2 |
2 |
.021-.026 |
.024 |
Eman River, Sweden |
PCB contaminated |
NR |
3 |
raw surface drinking water |
HxCDFs |
1 |
1 |
85 |
NA |
Lockport, New York |
NR |
88 |
2 |
raw surface drinking water |
22 |
0 |
ND(.3-4.4) |
NA |
New York State |
NR |
86-88 |
2 |
treated surface drinking water |
|
2 |
2 |
.17-.19 |
.18 |
Eman River, Sweden |
PCB contaminated |
NR |
3 |
raw surface drinking water |
|
Heptachlorodibenzofurans (MW=409.31) |
|||||||||
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF |
1 |
1 |
210 |
210 |
Lockport, New York |
NR |
88 |
2 |
raw surface drinking water |
2 |
2 |
.083-.13 |
.11 |
Eman River, Sweden |
PCB contaminated |
NR |
3 |
raw surface drinking water |
|
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF |
2 |
2 |
.03-.058 |
.044 |
Eman River, Sweden |
PCB contaminated |
NR |
3 |
raw surface drinking water |
HpCDFs |
1 |
1 |
210 |
210 |
Lockport, New York |
NR |
88 |
2 |
raw surface drinking water |
22 |
0 |
ND(.8-6.6) |
NA |
New York State |
NR |
86-88 |
2 |
treated surface drinking water |
|
2 |
2 |
.18-.35 |
.26 |
Eman River, Sweden |
PCB contaminated |
NR |
3 |
raw surface drinking water |
|
Octachlorodibenzofurans (MW=444.76) |
|||||||||
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDF |
22 |
2 |
ND-0.8 |
2.45 |
New York State |
NR |
86-88 |
2 |
treated surface drinking water |
1 |
1 |
230 |
230 |
Lockport, New York |
NR |
88 |
2 |
raw surface drinking water |
|
2 |
2 |
.15-.36 |
.26 |
Eman River, Sweden |
PCB contaminated |
NR |
3 |
raw surface drinking water |
|
Footnote References
NOTES: Summary statistics provided in or derived from references; when reference did not compute mean, one-half the detection limit was used for non-detects. Therefore, it is possible to have mean concentrations greater than the range (e.g., reported detection limit for nondetects greater than the positive sample).
NA = not applicable;
ND = non-detected (limit of detection);
NR = not reported.
Descriptions provided were those given by reference or surmised from study description when not given.
Sources: 2. Meyer, et al. (1989) 3. Rappe, et al. (1989b)